The 32-year-old anarchic socialite topped Glamour magazine’s annual
style list for the third year running. Not bad for a woman recently
embroiled in a very public drug abuse scandal.Kate Moss edged Sienna Miller into second spot followed closely by
Ms Beckham in third. Victoria Beckham has moved up the rankings,
perhaps in part due to her new found career as a fashion designer with
Rock & Republic. Nicole Richie is the year’s highest climber, up 33
places to number four, which probably says more about Paris Hilton than
it does about Ms Richie. Halle Berry is fifth, followed by Charlize
Theron, Jennifer Aniston, Mischa Barton, Catherine Zeta-Jones and
Nicole Kidman. On the flip-side, the worst-dress woman is Celebrity Big
Brother housemate Jodie Marsh, followed by Jordan, Paris Hilton and
Britney Spears. So what differentiates the best-dressed from the worst-dress? What’s
the criteria for judging who dresses well as opposed to who dresses
poorly? Indeed, what qualifies anyone to publish such a judgmental and
ultimately utterly subjective list? Perhaps this categorising says more
about our society than it does about the personalities being judged;
it’s like a glamorous form of cronyism! The judges spew forth their
subjective views based on personal friendships and ambitions. Indeed,
how can anyone, even renowned designers, issue a truly objective list
of who dresses well as opposed to who dresses poorly. The very essence
of true style is indefinable and personal; there is no objective
criteria it’s all utterly subjective and varies from one person to
another and that’s what makes fashion and style so attractive and
inspiring. Maybe the girls at Glamour Magazine might consider an
in-house best and worst dressed woman — this would provide them with a
deeper understanding of what it means to label other woman best and
worst.

Post a comment

Name

Comments

Verification Code